3.8% Annuity Income Surtax in the Health Reconciliation Act
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010
The conventional wisdom when doing a Roth IRA conversion in 2010 is to advise your clients to take Congress’ generous offer and wait to pay half the tax in the 2011 tax year and the other half in the 2012. However, it will be better for many of your clients to attribute the income to the 2010 tax year because of the tax increases that start in 2011:
· the 10% tax bracket sunsets. This means that those filing Joint tax returns will pay 15% instead of 10% on the first $17,200 of income ($8,600 Single), an $840 tax increase.
· the marriage penalty will return. Taxpayers who file a Joint return will pay 25% on $29,050 of their income instead of 15%. This is a $2,905 increase for Joint tax payers with Adjusted Gross Incomes of $174,800 or more.
· the 31% income tax bracket will be replaced by 33% and the 35% tax bracket has been replaced by 39.6%.
· If HR 3200 becomes law, add a 1% surcharge to the 31% tax bracket, a 2% surcharge to the 39.6% tax bracket, and a 4.4% surcharge on income that exceeds $1,000,000 – that’s 44%.
So what does this mean in dollar and cents terms? Here are the tax calculations for a $1,000,000 Roth IRA conversion for a retired married couple, filing a joint return, who have an Adjusted Gross Income of $250,000 and itemized deductions of $50,000:
2010 Taxes Without Roth IRA Conversion: $41,811
2010 Taxes With $1,000,000 Roth IRA Conversion: $386,848
Roth IRA Conversion Cost: $345,037
2011 Taxes Without Roth IRA Conversion: $43,484
2011 Taxes With $500,000 Roth IRA Conversion: $241,716
2012 Taxes Without Roth IRA Conversion: $43,173
2012 Taxes With $500,000 Roth IRA Conversion: $240,280
Roth IRA Conversion Cost: $395,339
In this situation, your client would save over $50,000 in Federal Income Taxes by attributing the $1,000,000 income from the Roth IRA Conversion to 2010 instead of $500,000 in 2011 and 2012. Clients who have lower incomes and/or smaller rollovers may find that splitting the income between 2011 and 2012 is ideal, but in this situation, this is clearly not the case.
Take home message: Before making a Roth IRA Conversion recommendation, first calculate the income tax ramifications for your client.
�
Tuesday, August 4th, 2009
In 2010 thousands of retirees will get conned by misinformed or unscrupulous salespeople who will talk them into an unsuitable Roth IRA conversion. If you want to become one of those people who, like Bernie Madoff, make themselves rich at the expense of their unsuspecting clients, here is a step-by-step guide:![]()
1) Use a Roth IRA Conversion calculator similar to the one offered by CalcXML. This calculator is perfect, because it leaves no trace; your name does not appear, nor does the name of your client. Throw away the second page to avoid embarrassing questions about your input.
2) Use a lower tax bracket in the pre-retirement, “accumulation” years than the post-retirement, “distribution” years. This printout uses 25% and 33%.
3) Since this client does not have $250,000 of ready cash to pay the taxes for the conversion, use “Option 2,” where the taxes are painlessly paid from the existing IRA funds.
4) Sell a product that has a 25% premium bonus and explain that the bonus will cover the income taxes.
Informed financial professionals can instantly see problems with the above scenario:
1) Ethical financial professionals never use calculators that omit their contact information, the client’s name, assumptions used, pertinent disclosures, and includes a sentence about seeking the advice of an income tax professional.
2) A Roth IRA Conversion calculator that uses “Tax Bracket” fields can be manipulated to deceive the client as I did in the sample printout. As a minimum it should have an input for “Adjusted Gross Income” and use the income tax rates that President Obama proposed for 2010 and beyond. Nobody who has $500,000 added to their income in a single year is in a 25% tax bracket!
3) The software should take all income tax ramifications into account. The sample printout does not take into account the fact that the client is age 56, and would incur an additional $25,000 tax penalty (10% early withdrawal penalty).
4) Taking into account both of above mentioned potential tax issues, the income tax impact for this client is about $250,000 higher than what was disclosed!
5) Products with premium bonuses may help offset current income taxes, however, a premium bonus is never “free.” There is always a cost somewhere, often in the form of lower interest rates.
I recommend the following safeguards to protect consumers from tax penalties and financial institutions and their representatives from potential lawsuits:
1) Insurance companies, marketing organizations, and broker / dealers should train their representatives about a how a Roth IRA conversion will affect a client’s current and future income tax situation, and how to determine whether it is suitable for their client.
2) Insurance agents and registered representatives should insist that a licensed income tax professional review the tax calculations and assumptions of Roth IRA conversions over $100,000. This may save the client tens of thousands of dollars in taxes, and a tax professional’s endorsement may shield against a future lawsuit.
3) File a complaint with the appropriate supervising authority against any insurance agent or securities representative who uses the above unethical approach to Roth IRA conversions.
4) Financial institutions should review all calculations and reports, including the tax professional’s review, before implementing a Roth IRA conversion.
Wednesday, July 1st, 2009
© 2010, Annuity Illustrations. All Rights Reserved.
WP theme by GetTemplate.com